0
I always enjoy reading Chuck Klosterman. He tries to get the reader to imagine how future humans (200 years ahead or more) will view our current beliefs about our contemporary pastimes, scientific paradigms, aesthetic judgments, political views, et cetera. In general, he succeeds at this project, but he also tends to shy away from planting his own flag in the ground and outright stating what he thinks future humans will think of our current worldviews and opinions. He'd probably say he accomplished his goal, but because I enjoy his nonfiction so much, I always really want to hear what Chuck thinks.
HPB Staff ReviewLike most of Klosterman's non-fiction books, you find him arguing with himself. "But What If We're Wrong" is about viewing current thoughts and ideas 1,000+ years from now. Are our current assumptions right? Are we so sure we're right because everyone else agrees with us right now? Topics in his book range from science (which has ideas that have changed multiple times in the past 1,000 years) to television and the constitution. Klosterman says many times in his book that he is probably wrong about his assumptions and predictions about the future, but what I find interesting is...what if he's right?
HPB Staff Review