Why Don't Students Like School?: A Cognitive Scientist Answers Questions about How the Mind Works and What It Means for the Classroom

by Willingham, Daniel T.
ISBN: 9781119715665
5 (1)
Availability:
$11.49
Used - Trade Paperback - 9781119715665

Available Offers

Ship to HPB West Lane Avenue Out of stock at HPB West Lane Avenue Check other stores
$1.99 - Ready for pickup Apr 16 - 19
Ship to Me
$3.99 - Get it Apr 16 - 19
Only 4 left

Overview

Why Don't Students Like School? Second Edition features 25% updated material while still honoring the classic, beloved approaches of the original. The book draws its themes from the most frequently asked questions in his "Ask the Cognitive Scientist" column in the American Educator, such as -- How can I teach students the skills they need when standardized testing just requires facts? Why do students remembers everything on TV, but forget everything I say? How should I adjust my teaching for different learning styles?

The second edition will help teachers improve their practice by explaining how they and their students think and learn and reveals the importance of story, emotion, memory, context, and routine in building knowledge and creating lasting learning experiences. This edition will be a valuable resource for both veteran and novice teachers, teachers-in-training, and for the principals, administrators, and staff development professionals who work with them.

  • Format: TradePaperback
  • Author: Willingham, Daniel T.
  • ISBN: 9781119715665
  • Condition: Used
  • Dimensions: 8.90 x 1.00
  • Number Of Pages: 320
  • Publication Year: 2021

Customer Reviews

Rating Snapshot

5 ★   100%
4 ★   0%
3 ★   0%
2 ★   0%
1 ★   0%
5
1 Ratings

0

0% Would Recommend
0 Recommendations

Review Images

Sort by:
Filter by:

  • A short-and-sweet must read for any parent or teacher, IMO.

    Paul F. - 5 years 7 months ago

    Excellent! One of the best books relating to education (and personal development) I've read in my last two years of deep-diving into education. Willingham's points are truly based in science and his discussion of implications are 99% free of ideology.